Such a simple question! How come no one can answer?!
Truly, I very much dislike rude people :evil: .
Dra'Gon
P.S. Sorry to put this here, but sometimes I get really bugged and have to say something.
For a good laugh {hopefully} >> megamatts.50megs.com
My WritersCafe profile>>
http://www.writersca...BlueDragonFire/
I think that happens often here, and it's a sign of a good forum community.
No, I am not angry. I think you misunderstood me. In the very end of my very first post I wrote:benny, maybe if you try being nicer with your posts you might get better answers or ones that will properly address your problem. to me, at least, you sounded pretty angry at everyone for not answering your problem.
which proves that I was quite polite with my potential supporters. The reason why I said "How come no one can answer my question?" was because I was surprised at how long it was taking to solve such a simple problem. This wasn't a phrase expressing anger. This was just a phrase expressing some surprise.Thank you all in advance.
The only person that I might have sounded angry at was this BoBo", but only after he himself was quite rude toward me. Look what he wrote to me in his very first post:
I did search the forum prior to asking this question (yes, there are many good answers in FAQ, but not right to the point, as I have already said), yet BoBo" assumed that I didn't. And based on this wrong assumption he went on to say that I was "moaning". As you can see, he was rude with me first. I think your words about being nicer should be addressed to him, not to me.One, if not the main reason will be that this is a FAQ, and even moaning won't cover that you obviously hasn't searched the forum in advance to help yourself.
To tell you the truth, I don't think you need snippets of my codes here. I just need a command or a sequence of commands which would perform one simple task: Wait until the page is fully loaded. That's it. It's just that simple! If it's still not clear, then imagine I just want a script that would open a web page and right after it's been fully loaded would give me a message box saying "The page has been fully loaded". And that's it! That's all I need, really!One thing you should know when posting on the forums, giving snippets of code helps US figure out what you're doing so that we can come up with a solution without wasting time saying "try this generic solution that may or may not work...and if it will, we hope you implement it into your code correctly and hope you don't come complaining to us that it doesn't work...i.e. the id 10 T problem." as my colleague says...user malfunction.
Well, I am not a good searcher either. I DID search the forum before, but all I could find was just some "close solutions", but not the solutions "right to the point"You say you searched the forums already? did you use the right search string? I can tell you i've searched the forums for certain things under 4, 5 and even 6 different terms and couldn't find anything...then my boss finds something relevant in like 30 seconds.
Again, detecting what the status bar is saying is not my point!!! My point is detecting whether the page is fully loaded! I think there is a way to do that without detecting the status bar.And no, i didn't answer your question. you asked for an answer to a simple problem. detecting when the status bar says "100% Done" may not be a simple thing to do, i've never played with it.
Oh yes, I did.also, have you tried using the AutoHotKey Help file?
Well, thanks for telling me this. I am familiar with StatusBarGetText. I did try using it in the past. I remember something was wrong there. What exactly I don't remember now. Of course, if I find no other way (avoiding the need of detecting the status bar), then I will have to come back to trying to use StatusBarGetText command.very very good source. it has a command in there called StatusBarGetText....maybe it's just me, but i would assume that playing with that and a loop for a little bit might solve your problem. if you do use a loop + gettext and check it, make sure to have some kind of delay in case it displays the "done" message prior to actually completely displaying the page.
You are wrong here again! I am not lazy. I am more than willing to write code by myself and I have already written it, except loading-the-whole-page-prior-to-proceeding-to-the-next-step problem turned out to be quite a task for me.Else, you might just be lazy and don't want to write your own code.
Don't worry. I am not offended.take no offense, i mean no harm.
Have a nice day!
May I ask you one question: why are you so rude? I think this forum deserves something better than such posts like yours - containing bad words, expressing rude attitude and just "stating something which is obvious" without providing any help.
Actually, in your "statement of the obvious" you were wrong on all accounts. Let's see:
Did I really say "I ONLY did it to get a response"? You've misquoted me. My actual words were these:This is just stating the obvious {at least obvious to me so I won't speak for everyone}, but if someone makes a cr@ppy "request" such as "Beeny-D" then it would serve them right not to have it answered. He even said he only did it to get a response.
As you can see, I didn't say "only" here, which means I wasn't doing it just for fun.I deliberately didn't put the subject in there. Why? Because I wanted to catch some people like you. And look, it worked!
Allow me to tell you that you are being way too serious here. Partly, this was a kind joke, which neither you, nor Bobo" got (I admit I should have used a smiley). On the other hand, I DID do it on purpose, but not just for fun! I decided not to disclose the essence of my question in the subject line, because I wanted the supporters to get into the details of my problem. Had I put in the subject line something general like "Waiting till the page is fully loaded", many potential supporters would have just ignored my question as to them it would have looked like too simple a question to bother to answer. Understand? This was not to annoy people. I really had a question and I am very thankful to those who have have already answered it.
Wrong! I do respect all the participants of this forum, as well as all people on this earth. Look, in your post you said a lot of bad things about me, but in my response to you I am still quite polite. That means that I am still respecting you.This means, again IMO, that he is A) disrespectful
Wrong again! I do have a lot of good things in my life to enjoy, and, believe me, they are way better than annoying people. (Plus, how can you draw such a conclusion about someone's life just based on one his act? What if he was just in a bad mood? You are too absolutistic in your thinking.has nothing better to do with his life than annoy people
Wrong again! I can do a lot of things for myself. The only thing I can't make so far is to create a script that would take a pause before a web page is fully loaded.C) can't do anything for himself so he has to "make" other people do it for him.
I agree with you - I don't like rude people either. So, please, don't be among them.Truly, I very much dislike rude people :evil: .
It's OK. We are all people, so we all make mistakes. I can understand.P.S. Sorry to put this here, but sometimes I get really bugged and have to say something.
Have a nice day! :wink:
Well, garry was able to identify the link which offers an even more reliable option/code, if compared with those which uses Statusbar.... But you are more interested to ignore forum standards, but playing foolish games with your supporters, just to call it afterwards "I'm a marketing PRO - see I've created an eye-catching-subject-line". Which btw, won't help to solve your issue at all.
a) You're obviously a marketing genius!
Unfortunatley your foolproof campaign is already used at Kindergardens around the world since ages ---> "Wer das liest ist doof".
So, better check out existing copyrights!! :wink:
... and can identify a requesters current skill level. If we'd provide rocket science code which those aren't able to handle on their own afterwards, for the sake that we have to write it completely - we aren't that stupid, right?!One thing you should know when posting on the forums, giving snippets of code helps US figure out what you're doing so that we can come up with a solution ...
"How come no one can answer?!". Because you deserve it? Useless subject line, no code -> no answers? Correct.
Bobo", you are too aggressive in the way you respond to my posts and, also, you seem to lack some sense of humor. Please read my previous too posts. You will find there a lot of things related to you.
Benny-D
P.S.: Thanks for complementing on my marketing skills, but I don't undertsand German, so I don't know what "Wer das liest ist doof" means. As far as copyrights are concerned, I can only say this: if my marketing method "has already been used at all Kindergartens around the world since ages" then I don't really need to worry about copyrights :wink:
[VxE], but not Benny-D was able to find this one:One, if not the main reason will be that this is a FAQ, ...
regardless that he has stated that ...http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:C4uyyQuSptIJ:www.autohotkey.com/docs/FAQ.htm+%22How+to+detect+when+a+web+page+is+finished+loading%3F%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Guess why?!I did search the forum prior to asking this question (yes, there are many good answers in FAQ, but not right to the point, as I have already said), yet BoBo" assumed that I didn't.
Anyway, the aggressive BoBo has had already provided a link which is given at the above mentioned linked page:
which has been ignored by Benny-D. garry has provided/de-smileyed the same link again.http://www.autohotkey.com/forum/topic19256.html = "Determine if a WebPage is completely loaded in IE"
Is it ..
a) lazyness
ignorance
c) a handycap
.. that someone seems not willing to check out the supporters posts in detail?
Guess it's my lack of humor, that wasting someones time won't make me laugh. :oops:
So, my appologize goes to Benny-D, delivering the insight that intuitive, issue related subject lines aren't funny enough to get the attention of the crowd. 8)
A thread like this one is the price to pay...
I've already forgiven you. Just try next time to be nicer with people asking for help - no matter how lazy, ignorant or handicapped they may seem to you.So, my appologize goes to Benny-D...
Too bad that your statements made your supporters even more angry.Too bad that my question made you angry so much.
I owe you something for your generosity to forgive me. Based on that I'll follow your given advise once you try next time to use a meaningfull, descriptive, intuitive subject line. Fair enough.I've already forgiven you. Just try next time to be nicer with people asking for help
TBH, I'm not really used to that scenario. The majority of people here accept some kinda standard of communication. But I'll keep in mind that you prefer to be treated nicely regardless if you act like being part of a lazy, ignorant or handicapped minority. Feel free to remind me about your specific status within the forum, next time we have to communicate again... no matter how lazy, ignorant or handicapped they may seem to you.
8)
Viola - Guest - Posted: here Post subject: Such a simple question! How come no one can answer!?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this is how Benny-D's thread's title was, right?
Why did you delete it?
He was amazing. I loved reading his posts there. Guys, admit it - he beat you all!Moderator! - Guest - Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It has been moved to General Chat.
:lol: Thx Viola alias Benny-DHe was amazing. I loved reading his posts there. Guys, admit it - he beat you all!
Benny has already left. He is not at school at the moment. But, Bobo'', admit, he beat you, didn't he?Thx Viola alias Benny-D
I'm curious, are you in an elementary school?Benny has already left. He is not at school at the moment. But, Bobo'', admit, he beat you, didn't he?
HA-HA-HA you're almost right , BoBo"I'm curious, are you in an elementary school?