Jump to content

Sky Slate Blueberry Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate
Photo

The future of the forum: Poll


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
109 replies to this topic

Poll: The future of the forum: (103 member(s) have cast votes)

How should we proceed?

  1. Keep everything like it is (3 votes [2.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.91%

  2. Migrate to a new server but (try to) get the domain "autohotkey.com" from Polyethene (73 votes [70.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 70.87%

  3. Migrate to a new server and use a new domain, but keep "AutoHotkey" as name (12 votes [11.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.65%

  4. Voted Migrate to a new server and re-brand AutoHotkey completely (12 votes [11.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.65%

  5. Other (please explain) (3 votes [2.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.91%

Vote
CodeNewbee
  • Members
  • 104 posts
  • Last active: Dec 02 2015 10:12 PM
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2013

@ Alibaba

Da hier anscheinend sowieso Anarchie herrscht, antworte ich mal einfach in Deutsch.
Die vielen Probleme im Forum sind wirklich nicht schön. Die Syntax Highlight Umsetzung ist unter aller Sau, die Spoiler Ansicht sollte bei längeren Scripten der Standart sein, und, und, und.

Allerdings finde ich Euer neues und, zumindest im deutschen Hilfebereich, bisher komplett leeres Forum auch keine gute Idee.
Zumindest die alten Inhalte sollten dann portiert werden, selbst wenn ihr nicht den Zugriff auf die Datenbank habt, liesse sich dies mit HTTrack realisieren.
Damit wären die Seiten zumindest statisch zu portieren.

Ohne die Portierung halte ich das neue Forum für relativ sinnfrei. Denn hier wurden schon so viele zum Teil geniale Ideen veröffentlicht, das ich es schlicht und ergreifend für falsch halte, diese zu begraben.
Ein neues aber nacktes Forum kann hier doch wohl auch nicht das Allheilmittel sein.

Meine Meinung !!!!!



smorgasboard
  • Members
  • 660 posts
  • Last active: Jan 14 2016 08:53 AM
  • Joined: 18 Jul 2012

used google translator for the above post and this is what it says

"

Since there apparently anarchy rules anyway, I answer simply times in German.
The many problems in the forum are really not nice. The syntax highlight implementation is under all that spoiler view should be the standard for longer scripts, and, and, and.

However, I find your new and, at least in the German aid area, previously completely empty forum also not a good idea.
At least the old contents should be then ported, even if you do not have access to the database, this could be realized with HTTrack.
So that the pages would be at least static to port.

Without porting I think the new forum for relatively sinnfrei. Because so many here were published in part inspired ideas, I quite simply think it is wrong to bury them.
But Naked is a new forum here but probably not be the panacea.

My Opinion!!"


tank
  • Administrators
  • 4345 posts
  • AutoHotkey Foundation
  • Last active: May 02 2019 09:16 PM
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2007

There is a project to take the current forum content (we do not have the DB) and make static searchable content out of it. If Poly does offer up the DB then i can attempt a true import into the new forum. 


Never lose.
WIN or LEARN.

Alibaba
  • Members
  • 435 posts
  • Last active: Nov 19 2014 04:21 PM
  • Joined: 01 Nov 2012

@ Alibaba

Da hier anscheinend sowieso Anarchie herrscht, antworte ich mal einfach in Deutsch.
Die vielen Probleme im Forum sind wirklich nicht schön. Die Syntax Highlight Umsetzung ist unter aller Sau, die Spoiler Ansicht sollte bei längeren Scripten der Standart sein, und, und, und.

Allerdings finde ich Euer neues und, zumindest im deutschen Hilfebereich, bisher komplett leeres Forum auch keine gute Idee.
Zumindest die alten Inhalte sollten dann portiert werden, selbst wenn ihr nicht den Zugriff auf die Datenbank habt, liesse sich dies mit HTTrack realisieren.
Damit wären die Seiten zumindest statisch zu portieren.

Ohne die Portierung halte ich das neue Forum für relativ sinnfrei. Denn hier wurden schon so viele zum Teil geniale Ideen veröffentlicht, das ich es schlicht und ergreifend für falsch halte, diese zu begraben.
Ein neues aber nacktes Forum kann hier doch wohl auch nicht das Allheilmittel sein.

Meine Meinung !!!!!

 

Ich arbeite gerade an einer Portierung.

Die statische Kopie wird heute noch fertig geparst und auf den Server des neuen Forums hochgeladen.

Aus diesen Dateien werden wir dann versuchen eine Datenbank zu generieren, allerdings wird dies etwas mehr Zeit kosten.

 

Keine Angst, das gesamte Forum ist in seinem jetzigen Zustand komplett gesichert und steht bald auch auf auto-hotkey.com zur Verfügung!


Find the recent autohotkey version here: ahkscript.org


DataLife
  • Members
  • 1022 posts
  • Last active: Nov 27 2015 01:09 AM
  • Joined: 27 Apr 2008

I believe that the lack of CSS for such an extended time is so destructive to new viewers that it has to be deliberate. Possibly sabotaging AHK, but why?? Has to be deliberate, not just "no time" or "preccoupied".


Gone - > autohotkey.com/wiki
Gone - > AutoHotkey.net
Gone - > German forum
Gone - > Good CSS

Seems like a concerted effort to take down the AutoHotkey forum community or the worst management ever.
Check out my scripts.  (MyIpChanger) (XPSnap) (SavePictureAs) All my scripts are tested on Windows 7, AutoHotkey 32 bit Ansi unless otherwise stated.

JnLLnd
  • Members
  • 193 posts
  • Last active: Jul 23 2015 02:15 AM
  • Joined: 30 Dec 2007

There is a project to take the current forum content (we do not have the DB) and make static searchable content out of it. If Poly does offer up the DB then i can attempt a true import into the new forum.


Meanwhile, do you suggest that we repost active content (discussions or scripts) on the new forum?

nnnik
  • Members
  • 1625 posts
  • Last active: Jan 24 2019 02:19 PM
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2012

No... it will take some time but the Posts will be recreated sooner or later.


Visit the new forum ahkscript.org.

http://ahkscript.org


lagomorph
  • Members
  • 403 posts
  • Last active: May 15 2014 03:41 PM
  • Joined: 02 Apr 2010
we should only move if we can get the URL name. Without the brand, the confusion wouldn't be worth it...

gregster
  • Members
  • 283 posts
  • Last active: Nov 09 2015 03:08 AM
  • Joined: 19 Mar 2009

we should only move if we can get the URL name. Without the brand, the confusion wouldn't be worth it...

 

I assume, you have no know CSS problems with this site...



Guest10
  • Members
  • 1216 posts
  • Last active: Oct 30 2015 05:12 PM
  • Joined: 27 Oct 2012
 

amen!
Gone - > autohotkey.com/wiki
Gone - > AutoHotkey.net
Gone - > German forum
Gone - > Good CSS

Seems like a concerted effort to take down the AutoHotkey forum community or the worst management ever.

 

adrianh
  • Members
  • 616 posts
  • Last active: Apr 07 2016 03:35 PM
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2012

AHK is a known name, so I'd try and stick with that.  However, that said, if that fails, a rebrand is really the only viable option.  Having two servers using the AHK name will just screw AHK over.

 

 

A


my library base
AHK_L is the bomb! With a whole lot of bug fixes, Unicode support, associative array objects, array like objects, classes and variadic functions, why wouldn't you switch?


nnnik
  • Members
  • 1625 posts
  • Last active: Jan 24 2019 02:19 PM
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2012

Hey this is what I get when I try to login to the new forum:

 

[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 3019: include(./includes/captcha/captcha_factory.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 3019: include() [function.include]: Failed opening './includes/captcha/captcha_factory.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/php5_3/lib/php')
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4752: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4754: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4755: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4756: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)


Visit the new forum ahkscript.org.

http://ahkscript.org


nnnik
  • Members
  • 1625 posts
  • Last active: Jan 24 2019 02:19 PM
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2012

Works again


Visit the new forum ahkscript.org.

http://ahkscript.org


tank
  • Administrators
  • 4345 posts
  • AutoHotkey Foundation
  • Last active: May 02 2019 09:16 PM
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2007

Works again

Thanks to deciding to have more than one ftp user. someone actually beat me to fixing it :) i frakkin love this community. just takes someone brave enough to let people help


Never lose.
WIN or LEARN.

Bugz000
  • Members
  • 155 posts
  • Last active: Oct 14 2015 01:03 PM
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Hello there

for those having issues with cdn.authotkey.com being down i have set up a proxy free to use on my home connection as i have no issues viewing the forum myself

http://www.bugz000.co.uk/nameless/

Enjoy- please use with respect

i do have completely unlimited traffic running at
http://www.speedtest...sult/3011600751

68.58 mbps down
16.80 mpbs up

but i would rather NOT have to contend with fair usage complaints tongue.png

Special thanks to Nameless_exe for setting most of this up (99% him grin.png)

n39peTm.jpg
Hire me to write your code! (join IRC or PM me for details)