joedf wrote:

fischgeek wrote:It also looks like my links are still active for the stock photos if we're still interested in that.

https://autohotkey.com/boards/viewtopic ... 611#p64611

The photo is already/currently in use.

fischgeek wrote:It also looks like my links are still active for the stock photos if we're still interested in that.

https://autohotkey.com/boards/viewtopic ... 611#p64611

aztec3 wrote:Okay, I like the new AutoHotKey page...but would it be possible to place the links to like SciTE4AutoHotKey and the other third-party apps (Pulover's Macro Creator) that use to be on the old page too?

Thanks!!!

joedf wrote:so traurig...

tank wrote:that does not change the fact that 100mb limitation basically makes the internet unusable

joedf wrote:so traurig...

tank wrote:

nnnik wrote:Sorry

As am i my friend. Some how in a string of hasty poorly worded responses i seem to have contributed to you thinking that i do not intend to listen when making choices about code changes to this site.
Let me be clear here. This thread is to serve that purpose. To listen. Not to make choices that adversely affect anyone, just because it suites my idiom.
When i made the comment regarding 20/70/10 it was in regards to the fact that while KB downloaded per request affect site performance, I cannot consider a 100MB/month data-plan in decisions about site features. a 100MB/month plan is an out-liar and no one can build a modern internet site around such a consideration. Of course i want to keep page load time fast which necessitates the smallest possible home page. the smallest possible home page that fits the purpose of greeting new and veteran visitors of this site. One that appears to be up to date like the software we distribute and support. One that like the AutoHotkey language is easy/obvious to get started from.
One that observes that the internet itself is very different from when Chris started this.
So small as possible yes. under 1 MB for first visitors. you betcha. Clean and functional is what this thread is about.
In the course of discussing function however someone says you guys all say feature "X" is critical but that wont load on IE7 correctly. IE7 falls as an out-liar and i cannot use it as a consideration. it is an out-liar because so few real visitors use IE7. and the majority of mainstream users feel like critical feature "X" is critical. In those situations it is a site admins job to first make sure no work around exist but if not then to remove out-liars from the objections to make the implementation that fits most of the user base.
the same would be true if someone conversely said we need feature "X" but it only (doesn't)/works in Edge browser.
At this time i cannot think of any site features that would affect OS except when we do eventually out of necessity enforce TLS 1.2 for the forum. as i said its a different internet. and we are under constant assault. by 2018 no OS/Browser that does not support TLS 1.2 will be able to use online banking/financial sites. by then i will for the sake of the security of this site consider anyone that cannot use TLS 1.2 an out-liar. they wont be able to use google either IMO.
so far the only thing i have seen in this thread that i have said i cannot include in our plans about a new home page "if we reach consensus" is the consideration of a 100MB/month data plan. that person cant browse the internet to more than about 50 pages per month. there is no timetable set for a home page change. .