I'm a blunt person, Joe, but I never intend to offend or push my will onto someone - just saying things as I see them and the rest is up to the people in charge. ;)
I have spent many days and nights in a row, long time ago when I was younger, helping people. I like helping others but lately I seem to have less and less power for that, and it makes me sad. However I still believe that if we don't help each other, trust each other, love each other - in a friendly way at least - then humanity is doomed.
Thank you for looking into the issues I reported, it's much appreciated.

[b]@swagfag[/b] Ahh okay, good to know! :+1:
[b]@gregster[/b] Whoops! My bad, I've just set a static color for it. Thanks for reporting this.
[b]@Drugwash[/b] Not a pest at all, ahaha I great respect for you not fearing to say what you have in mind. Not sure of thoses css quirks, but I can definitely fix the logo later tonight.
I actually forgot when I was doing late fixes last night at 2am :b

Thank you, that's definitely an [c]improvement[/c]

I implemented a quick workaround that should work for now but makes the c tag loose both the background color and the special text color it had.

[quote=nnnik post_id=248512 time=1542124100 user_id=74]
I meant more like a link to the post rather than an image.
[/quote]
Yeah, what I tried to explain is that I now discovered that it is [u]every[/u] post that contains this c-tags. If the post is highlighted, the text will disappear. If the post is not highlighted, you will see gray text on white background (this is my current workaround - just highlight another post).

But yeah thanks for the report I have identified the error.

I meant more like a link to the post rather than an image.

[quote=nnnik post_id=248493 time=1542121937 user_id=74]
Could you link example posts that work and those that dont.
[/quote]
After investigating further, it doesn't seem as bad as I thought. :)

I was just putting together a list, when I discovered that it actually only happens if a post is highlighted, like when you click the heading of a post or if a post is new.
This seems to change not only the heading font color from blue to white (in the Digi theme), but also affects the font color in the c-tags: from greyish to white - that means, it is not dependent on the user who created the post. It is not urgent, but I would be nice if it could be added to the to-do list. Thanks for the efforts so far :thumbup:
(btw, before the forum update, it looked totally different: it was just a border around the text in the c-tags - that was much nicer, imho)

Example:

Sorry I couldn't help you :(

[i]Danke schön, mein Freund.[/i]
I've just tested again with the same original file. It still takes an abnormal amount of time to upload and results in the same error.
Could it be file type (PNG) or its compression type/mode? Or maybe you admins have restrictions removed?
Let's leave it for a later time, there may be more important issues to fix for now.
Thank you for your support.

[attachment=0]3848765-wallpaper-images-download.jpg[/attachment]

Ahh no it's just really strange.
Attatchments should work - they are not a lot of work to maintain either probably just some settings.
I will go over the settings again..
I found something if you could test out uploading once again that would be great.
If this does not work we may have to wait until tank comes online again.

[quote=nnnik post_id=248462 time=1542106355 user_id=74]
The maximum Image file size is set to 2MB currently - I have no idea what a good limit would be - but I increased it to 8 for now.
BTW your image compression ratio is horrible. I loaded the same Image using GIMP and exported it again only to end up with a 5th of the size.
[/quote]
1. Actual file size is 71kB (not MB) for the [b]original image[/b] so there should be no issue whatsoever with that. But why does it fail at [b]1190px width[/b] when 800px succeeds?
2. I perform image editing in [b]FastStone Image Viewer[/b], that's the only application that I can use while keeping my sanity. It does have three compression options for PNG but the other two yield even higher file size. It's strange that a smaller image size yields a higher file size but there's nothing I can do in that regard - I tried GIMP once and there will never be a second time. Of course, one can choose JPG over PNG but I prefer clarity - that is, lossless compression.

I still think there is a [b]image size[/b] (not file size) limit in place that declares uploaded files as invalid when crossed. I tried the 1190px image again just now and the same error popped up.
The way I see things, the board should accept any image size for upload and - when upload finished - create a thumbnail of a reasonable size that, when clicked, should open the real/original image in a new tab (preferrably) or window. I don't know how the board/theme works right now but it seems to request the original file over and over again - hence the large upload size - and then fail to process it. Or something.

I'm really sorry for being such a pest, it is not in the slightest my intention. :(
If any of you - JoeDF or nnnik or any other admin - would like to provide me with an e-mail address in private, I'd send you the original image so you could perform some tests yourselves, preferrably in the QtWeb browser (which is, as mentioned before, portable so it wouldn't mess up your systems).

Could you link example posts that work and those that dont.

[quote=gregster post_id=248482 time=1542119229 user_id=80]
Unfortunately, using the (dark) Digi theme, the [c][/c] tag now (today) creates white text on white background...
https://i.imgur.com/RmayV1G.jpg

It changed today, I think - so far, until at least 4 hours ago, it was at least somehow readable (the text was a little bit darker than the background), although still totally different than the old effect of this tag. Now the only way to read the tagged text is to select this text.
[/quote]

It seems this (white on white) happens only in the posts of some users (like myself) - in the posts of some other users I still see the version with light text on white background. :wtf:

Unfortunately, using the (dark) Digi theme, the [c][/c] tag now (today) creates white text on white background...
https://i.imgur.com/RmayV1G.jpg

It changed today, I think - so far, until at least 4 hours ago, it was at least somehow readable (the text was a little bit darker than the background), although still totally different than the old effect of this tag. Now the only way to read the tagged text is to select this text.

[quote=swagfag post_id=248322 time=1542015060 user_id=75383]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/V8ddtsT.gif[/img]
just imagine the CTRL in there, as the cursor jumps. chrome latest stable, fwiw
[/quote]
it was being caused by the chrome extension "SurfingKeys", it seems

[attachment=0]test.png[/attachment]
The maximum Image file size is set to 2MB currently - I have no idea what a good limit would be - but I increased it to 8 for now.
BTW your image compression ratio is horrible. I loaded the same Image using GIMP and exportet it again only to end up with a 5th of the size.

What do you mean by 'packages'? Packets, maybe? No, I don't think so. I can send e-mails with attachments from POP Peeper in a normal timeframe (considering attachments get Base64 encoded so their size kinda doubles). Here, a 71kB file produces a 3MB upload so it would have to be a pretty lousy connection.

The same 1190x480px PNG image resized to 800x323px (and an increased size of 152kB) has been uploaded much faster (but still slower than normal) and succesfully:
[attachment=0]prosilver theme issues 800px.png[/attachment]
Then, I tried the original file again. It failed, as usual.
time: 11:01:10 -> 11:06:53 (5:43)
size: 11.326MB - 14.389MB (3.063MB)

I suspect an issue in some kind of resizing routine in the board code when uploaded image is wider than 800px.

[img]https://autohotkey.com/boards/download/file.php?id=5979[/img]
[attachment=0]dog.jpeg[/attachment]
Seems to work.
Could the increased upload size be the result of additional packages due to failed packages?