Search found 4779 matches

by jeeswg
Today, 16:49
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- @Helgef: I found these links, but I don't get a sense of the overall plan re. string/numeric types. Adding CaseSensitive parameter to StrReplace. by HelgeffegleH · Pull Request #103 · Lexikos/AutoHotkey_L · GitHub https://github.com/Lexikos/AutoHotkey_L/pull/103 Adding binary operator: !== and cha...
by jeeswg
Today, 14:39
Forum: Ask For Help
Topic: log in to Gmail/YouTube programmatically (+ YouTube API)
Replies: 9
Views: 555

Re: log in to Gmail/YouTube programmatically (+ YouTube API)

This is really interesting Malcev, thanks very much for the information. I will investigate further.
by jeeswg
Today, 07:58
Forum: Ask For Help
Topic: log in to Gmail/YouTube programmatically (+ YouTube API)
Replies: 9
Views: 555

Re: log in to Gmail/YouTube programmatically (+ YouTube API)

- Wow thanks so much. By saving the html that is produced at the end, and creating a file, it appears to confirm that the login works. - Btw if you log in like this, it appears that you can't access Gmail/YouTube via Internet Explorer. It would be interesting if that were possible somehow. - Since I...
by jeeswg
Today, 07:14
Forum: Offtopic
Topic: UI Automation v. Acc (MSAA: Microsoft Active Accessibility)
Replies: 6
Views: 172

Re: UI Automation v. Acc (MSAA: Microsoft Active Accessibility)

- @malcev: Thanks for the info. Appreciated. - @jethrow: Yes, these mental to-do lists that go on forever. AFAIAC, other than the zoom issue, the non-UIA scripts all looked finished to me, although maybe you had other feature ideas, which could be interesting if other people wanted to work on those ...
by jeeswg
Today, 07:13
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

Oh. I think you're saying, that you think I'm saying, that we should switch, from using PRs, to using my system. Well, people could contribute at the C++ forum *and* use PRs. Personally, I would rather contribute at the C++ forum, and never use GitHub, but in theory I might use GitHub.
by jeeswg
Today, 04:15
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- Re. 'posting style is hard to deal with'. Not sure what you mean. Object to what? The entire C++ powerhouse idea? - Generally speaking you want really advanced features, involving syntax changes, right? 'Project JavAHK'? - Whereas I want the simple 'filling out' of existing functionality, generall...
by jeeswg
Today, 03:58
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- Well, I've presented my vision for an AutoHotkey C++ powerhouse. I think the vision is sound. We'll see how it functions. - I already said that it was more about queries and source code review, than 'discussions', so I'm not sure what you're objecting to. Misunderstandings are easy enough on the f...
by jeeswg
Today, 03:13
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- (I edited my post above re. listing functions.) - Part of what I want to do, is to in effect have a set of threads that act as a tutorial, so that people are producing a higher quality of source code. And capable programmers can learn the ropes, and be, within a short space of time, ready to add t...
by jeeswg
Today, 02:50
Forum: Wish List
Topic: StrReplace() should have option to replace from rear of string
Replies: 12
Views: 392

Re: StrReplace() should have option to replace from rear of string

- @nnnik: I'm sympathetic to the points you made. I considered all the options, and I came to what I believe is, all things considered, the best option. - Some people might think it's too many parameters, but I really don't think it's a big problem. - Another solution could be a space-separated opti...
by jeeswg
Today, 02:40
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- I agree with what you said about operators. It was more pseudocode. This, that I mentioned, would be an alternative: var1 MyCustomOp1 var2 . A finite (or infinite) number of redefinable binary operators. Or possibly operators that could only be defined on the script startup, tied to an existing fu...
by jeeswg
Today, 02:27
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- OK, well, you seem to like GitHub PRs. Since some of what I intend to do, would be inappropriate as GitHub PRs, I can at least give my approach a try to begin with. - Btw I don't recall anyone saying anything about operators with parameters. What are you referring to? StrOp and NumOp would be stan...
by jeeswg
Today, 02:10
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- I could imagine a forum, with one proposed function or group of functions per thread. - The OP takes responsibility for the finished function, although they may seed responsibility (and possibly retrieve it at a later date) if they feel someone else could do a better job. - Not everything needs 'd...
by jeeswg
Today, 01:33
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- @nnnik: Thanks for your comments. - (Just for the record, coffee and nnnik have stated some really obvious things that I already knew. Although clarity for a wider readership is good.) - I never wanted to or tried to dictate how people should use GitHub, nor did I complain about the other 100 pull...
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 22:28
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- The idea of disabling the ability of certain operators to handle strings has come as a surprise. I thought the whole point of the String function was to facilitate the use of such operators. Adding function StrCompare and disabling string compairsion of operators: < <= > >= by HelgeffegleH · Pull ...
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 22:17
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

You and coffee both have a 'certain style'.
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 21:59
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- These kind of changes, re. types, could have the highest rewrite costs of any changes suggested so far, they are as serious as they get. Maybe you don't have too many scripts to maintain, or that you intend to share with other people. - When I have wanted to propose important changes, but where th...
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 19:40
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)
Replies: 30
Views: 393

Re: NumOp/StrOp (with respect to !=/!==)

- @Helgef: I had thought that 'stricter' type handling for expressions might have some advantages, as well as some disadvantages. - Looking at the drip feed of GitHub pull requests, I now see further disadvantages, which may (or may not) be soluble if discussed properly. - I think this topic needs r...
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 15:40
Forum: AutoHotkey v2 Development
Topic: [Feature Request] Add "Sign" function
Replies: 2
Views: 72

Re: [Feature Request] Add "Sign" function

- I know it's relatively minor but I would agree that this should be added. - There's a certain selection of basic functions that should be built into all programming languages and I have been writing an article on this that I intend to publish, comparing 4 programming languages. - I would want Auto...
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 15:29
Forum: Wish List
Topic: StrReplace() should have option to replace from rear of string
Replies: 12
Views: 392

Re: StrReplace() should have option to replace from rear of string

- @User: I think your ideas are fine, it's just that I tend to suggest things in line with what currently exists. Something very conservative that hopefully wouldn't shock anyone. - I wouldn't start a new syntax convention just for one function. - You could start a thread in Wish List stating that y...
by jeeswg
Yesterday, 08:59
Forum: Ask For Help
Topic: Hotstrings using final sigma (Greek alphabet)
Replies: 2
Views: 35

Re: Hotstrings using final sigma (Greek alphabet)

You could use the Hotstring function. I've provided 2 examples, one with Greek letters, one with Latin (i.e. English) letters. ;q:: ;word with diacritics to word without diacritics (plus trailing middle-sigma to final-sigma) vList := " ( γλαῦκος )" Loop, Parse, vList, `n, `r { vTemp := A_L...

Go to advanced search