« What's on your mind? » Topic is solved

[joedf]

Oh windows...

[derz00]

I hate windows update


http://www.files.com/image/596525683dd37/Capture.png

[joedf]

Or there's other dumb thing running in the background for me too... keeps spamming new svhost.exe processes...

[vasili111]

NASA’s Juno Spacecraft Spots Jupiter’s Great Red Spot

[derz00]

This is my 100th 101th useless post!

[joedf]

This is my 100th 101th useless post!

[jNizM]

Avast acquires Piriform, makers of CCleaner (by ghacks)
Piriform is joining Avast (by Piriform)
Welcome Piriform to Avast (by Avast)

[joedf]

Nuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Avast likes to nag and put ads. >:(

[TLM]

NASA’s Juno Spacecraft Spots Jupiter’s Great Red Spot

I was wondering how the mission was going

[TLM]

[joedf]

Lol.

[TLM]

or "size" vs precision

[garry]

from The Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/articles/p-g-cuts-m ... 1501191104

Procter&Gamble said that its move to cut more than $100 million in digital marketing spend in the June quarter had little impact on its business, proving that those digital ads were largely ineffective.

an user comment :

On line advertising, in virtually all instances, is the most worthless expenditure imaginable.
Not only won't I buy based on these annoying ads, but the ads are so annoying they run the risk of damaging the brand's image.
Most people go on line to find something and they then go to the vendor's website to look or to buy.
If you do that, even if you have already purchased the product, you have to put up with banner ads for days, weeks or months for something you no longer have an interest in!
What an annoying waste of money.
Even worse are the ads with sound that blast you immediately when you log onto a site.
I keep the sound off to avoid them.
Even if the ad is designed to stay on for a set amount of time--I refuse to pay any attention to them.
Sellers--please stop these practices!!!
Facebook, Google, and all the rest of these clowns, have sold companies a bill of goods with their claims that these ads are effective.
In the vast majority of cases they are the exact opposite.

[TLM]

Starts Monday like..

[joedf]

lol

[nnnik]

from The Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/articles/p-g-cuts-m ... 1501191104

Procter&Gamble said that its move to cut more than $100 million in digital marketing spend in the June quarter had little impact on its business, proving that those digital ads were largely ineffective.

an user comment :

On line advertising, in virtually all instances, is the most worthless expenditure imaginable.
Not only won't I buy based on these annoying ads, but the ads are so annoying they run the risk of damaging the brand's image.
Most people go on line to find something and they then go to the vendor's website to look or to buy.
If you do that, even if you have already purchased the product, you have to put up with banner ads for days, weeks or months for something you no longer have an interest in!
What an annoying waste of money.
Even worse are the ads with sound that blast you immediately when you log onto a site.
I keep the sound off to avoid them.
Even if the ad is designed to stay on for a set amount of time--I refuse to pay any attention to them.
Sellers--please stop these practices!!!
Facebook, Google, and all the rest of these clowns, have sold companies a bill of goods with their claims that these ads are effective.
In the vast majority of cases they are the exact opposite.

And this my friends is succesful online advertising.

[TLM]

[tank]

NASA has a job opening for someone to defend Earth from aliens -- and it pays a six-figure salary

[joedf]

lol nice

[tank]

this http://cultofthepartyparrot.com/